Thursday, May 24, 2012

Executive Search: Land of the lost fight over shrinking pie

A recent spin through familiar territory has yielded enough material to warrant posting. Disclaimer: TGR once considered morphing into an executive search industry newsletter, but thanks to other intervening events, plans were shelved.

To understand both real and perceived value of executive search, you have to trace brand name CEO turnover situations, such as what recently took place at Yahoo. Their "search firm of record," if such a title still holds sway, was Heidrick & Struggles who assisted the board in the former selection of Carol Bartz who was fired and then replaced by Scott Thompson who also was recently fired (ok, officially resigned.) What role executive search played is left largely to perception, which tends to be shaped by media, such as the Wall Street Journal, and in the case of Yahoo, its digital cousin, All Things Digital. The perception game is where legends have historically been made. The makers comprise a short list: Tom Neff at Spencer Stuart and Gerry Roche at Heidrick & Struggles. There have been other big figures but these two tended to garner the most attention.

The game, however, has changed. Neff and Roche are now public vestiges to a bygone era. The challenge is how to re-define as these dynamics move away from old boy networks and smoke filled rooms on the Upper East Side to a more transparent, democratic approach that de-emphasizes going outside to find leaders. The exceptions tend to be the big companies who screw up governance or succession so badly that they have to use brand name firms to protect their own reputations. Insert Spencer Stuart, which was recently selected by Best Buy to right their sinking ship. The truth that no one at the "top" wants to acknowledge is that risk has been at all-time low during the most recent economic correction, and it remains a large obstacle to the change we can believe in.

Except for those who have already taken the risk and now thumb their noses at big search firms. Insert your own names here: Stephen Miles who used to be with Heidrick & Struggles in their leadership consulting business and now operates independently, Peter Crist who used to be with Korn Ferry prior to starting his own Chicago-based firm, Kelvin Thompson who now runs the global boutique Montarosa after a series of high-level roles with Boyden Search and Heidrick, respectively; and a personal favorite, Russell Reynolds, who still operates independently while his own namesake firm, Russell Reynolds & Associates, wagers on somehow someway. Matthew Wright, please phone home!

Where does all this lead? Who knows; fewer care. The new rules of the game are still sorting themselves out. One trend is clear. If you're an established entity who has to defend values at every turn, you're constantly under attack while being held to a standard that isn't shared by everyone else. Case in point: Recent public flapping by CT Partners, formerly Christian & Timbers, which has recently taken public shots at Heidrick & Struggles who used to employ CT Partners CEO, Brian Sullivan following the purchase of Sullivan's former financial services boutique.

If this summary is starting to sound like a bunch of cats fighting in a broken down barn, then you get the picture necessary to make your own conclusion. Due respect to the industry's only association, AESC, no metrics are required to evaluate this so called business, which has historically been plagued by bought out analysts and other charlatans with zero credibility. This lack of accountability may ultimately be the industry's undoing. In the meantime, anyone need a new CEO for the long awaited upturn?

# # #







Do you just want to be Facebook friends?

Note: Following is a monthly client letter distributed via email earlier today.

Dear Clients and Colleagues:
As the world now seems to revolve around the newly public enterprise called Facebook instead of the sun, it's virtually impossible not to pose a question that deserves a better answer (see subject line.) First some trademark perspective.

The social media universe has now come full circle. Whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr or LinkedIn, everyone is on their chosen channel(s,) but few if anyone married over the age of the 30 can encapsulate its value. The attitude has generally been since everyone else is doing it so there must be something worth exploring. Short of a few uprisings in the Middle East and other breaking news moments such as the recent same day retirement of Chicago Cubs pitcher Kerry Wood, the channels' ability to make a difference remains open to wide interpretation.

Take this down to a sliver called the executive marketplace and the playing field gets pretty clear pretty fast. High ranking executives have lost their jobs as a result of bad Twitter feeds (see http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/05/cfo-fired-for-boring-twitter-blog-and-facebook.html) while others such as Whole Foods CEO John Mackey Foods have gotten into trouble making inappropriate comments when weighed against their special interests. Couple that with major advertisers such as General Motors pulling Facebook ad dollars, and there's a "show me the value" mentality now emerging among decision-makers despite what personal usage metrics may indicate.

The real point here, however, lies in the cracks. Call it the bad social irony of social media. While the tools can obviously broaden networks and enrich thought horizons, the spread also has had the opposite effect. It's now quite acceptable to ignore people who actually call you, or worse yet, ignore the call while vice versa turning to a kinder, more passive LinkedIn profile for caller background. And I'm not talking about strangers -- quite to the contrary, people who actually know each other or have expressed a desire to help, do business with and/or be in real relationship as opposed to on-line pen pals.

Here's the requested call to action: If you want to simply be Facebook friends then state your case. There's nothing wrong with that intention; in fact, in most cases, it may be the right path. However, if you're a leader and you really want to build, develop and maintain relationships because that's one of your primary responsibilities, then don't fall into this trap. It's a dead zone of artificiality, avarice and laziness that quite frankly is no longer acceptable. Socially, business or otherwise. Last time anyone checked, clicks weren't the same as calls. Or at least not yet.

Happy social media-ing,

JG

Jeremy Garlington
Point of View, LLC
Five Concourse Pkwy./Suite 2850
Atlanta, GA 30328
Web log: "The Garlington Report (TGR)": www.povblogger.blogspot.com -- "Why do CEOs lie on resumes? Hint: Because they can."
Phone: 404-606-0637
Email: garlingtons@msn (primary); jgarlington@pointofviewllc.com (consultancy)

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Yahoo takeway: Time to restate resumes

By now the business world has learned the inevitable: Yahoo CEO Scott Thompson has resigned due to pressures stemming from fabricating or "over-inflating" a computer science degree on his resume. The crime, however, is never as bad as the cover-up. Thompson's defense that he essentially didn't know about the infraction until a 2004 vetting process when he joined PayPal and that he hasn't noticed anything since then obviously didn't pass anyone's smell test, including the Yahoo board.

What's the key takeaway? Leaders of public companies obviously have to be vigilant both about their businesses and personal credibility. The latter may factor more heavily now more than ever. Yet it continues to be a known fact that some of the best fiction lies on executive resumes. Message to those who are still fudging their CVs: Go ahead and restate your accomplishments just as you might restate quarterly earnings. Now is the time to get things right before someone else does.


# # #

First of its kind

"The Garlington Report" (TGR) represents the first new media forum devoted exclusively to executive-level leadership from the talent and search points of view.

For regular readers, rest assured -- you will continue to find monthly Pointes and other content that you've grown accustomed to. Please also feel free to navigate back to the consultancy's URL at http://www.pointofviewllc.com/.

Thanks for continuing to read, JG